<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Ariel ITzhaky - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/rel/</link><description>It&amp;#39;s all working
till you fix it ...</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: The 'PLUS' in DocumentSpecName</title><link>http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/rel/archive/2011/04/04/the-plus-in-documentspecname.aspx#917939</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:32:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c4f5bc-c09b-4439-a595-91a98c1847df:917939</guid><dc:creator>Mahesh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you. It resolved my issue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/aggbug.aspx?PostID=917939" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The 'PLUS' in DocumentSpecName</title><link>http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/rel/archive/2011/04/04/the-plus-in-documentspecname.aspx#873078</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:18:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c4f5bc-c09b-4439-a595-91a98c1847df:873078</guid><dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I fixed the problem !!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/aggbug.aspx?PostID=873078" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The 'PLUS' in DocumentSpecName</title><link>http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/rel/archive/2011/04/04/the-plus-in-documentspecname.aspx#871791</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:03:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c4f5bc-c09b-4439-a595-91a98c1847df:871791</guid><dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I try to reproduce your steps, could provide a full example ? perhaps I am commiting mistakes with the sintax:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;schema type&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;root name&amp;gt; ,&amp;lt;schema assembly full name&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Julian&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/aggbug.aspx?PostID=871791" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Delivery Notification with Direct Send Port</title><link>http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/rel/archive/2007/10/20/delivery-notification-with-direct-send-port.aspx#227456</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:27:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c4f5bc-c09b-4439-a595-91a98c1847df:227456</guid><dc:creator>Naveen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not sure why we even need such a scenario.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why do we need to keep track of NACK&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;when we are sending a message to message box&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;using direct binding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In direct binding, we use the Send port &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;to place a message into the message box,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;then why do we need to track for NACK at all??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/aggbug.aspx?PostID=227456" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Bitwise-And (&amp;) predicate on BizTalk Orchestration activation filter expression</title><link>http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/rel/archive/2009/01/21/bitwise-and-amp-predicate-on-biztalk-orchestration-activation-filter-expression.aspx#221281</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:16:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c4f5bc-c09b-4439-a595-91a98c1847df:221281</guid><dc:creator>John Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;i don't think it's a good idea to interfere in BizTalk engine and specially not to blog a post on this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/aggbug.aspx?PostID=221281" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Delivery Notification with Direct Send Port</title><link>http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/rel/archive/2007/10/20/delivery-notification-with-direct-send-port.aspx#177112</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:00:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c4f5bc-c09b-4439-a595-91a98c1847df:177112</guid><dc:creator>siva</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I followed same as above however it is not working for me. My proreject is little different from this. I have one orchestration. I receive the message in orch, then i corraleted AckRequied, CorrelatedToaken + ID (for filter it on send sport) same as above. Then I send the message. Partner is receiving the message however i am not receiving the ack or nack. it looks like orch is keep running/waitting. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; I am using 2 way http port and i have outbound and inbound mappings in the http port. So partner is not receiving the original msg. it get mapped in the send-recive port.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you think this might be the reason? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How can get ack or nack if:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I receive msg in orch and map it to partners schema on direck send-receive port and sent it to them and map the response to our standared in the port. This is HTTP prot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you in advance. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/aggbug.aspx?PostID=177112" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Consuming Web-Service method with string as input parameter</title><link>http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/rel/archive/2008/08/20/consuming-web-service-method-with-string-as-input-parameter.aspx#134086</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:11:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c4f5bc-c09b-4439-a595-91a98c1847df:134086</guid><dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Thank you Thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I want to have your babies&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/aggbug.aspx?PostID=134086" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>http://agilior.pt/blogs/</title><link>http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/rel/archive/2007/10/20/delivery-notification-with-direct-send-port.aspx#107683</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:33:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b5c4f5bc-c09b-4439-a595-91a98c1847df:107683</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/aggbug.aspx?PostID=107683" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>
