News

Disclaimer
Postings are provided 'As Is' with no warranties and confer no rights.

Navigation

Oracle LINQ, Entity Framework Support

Oracle LINQ Support Although Microsoft has 2 events dedicated for data providers writers, Oracle has no support, nor roadmap to support LINQ and ADO.Net Entity Framework. As Christian Shay (Product Manager in the .NET and Windows group at Oracle) says, this is a feature they are considering for a future release...

Too bad...

Enjoy!

Posted: Mar 13 2007, 08:45 AM by Guy Burstein | with 11 comment(s)

תגים:.Net, LINQ, Announces, ADO.Net 3.0, C# 3.0, Oracle

Comments

Adlai Maschiach said:

So true , and so sad , but due to the fact that Oracle thinks that Java is better it has incorperated into it's database the equvalent "hibernate" ,which is ( as far as I understood ) "LINQ" Java-Edition.

http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/vohra_hibernate.html

# March 13, 2007 9:18 AM

Guy Burstein's Blog said:

I've been following the ADO.Net Team Blog for quite some time now, sice the ADO.Net Entity Framework

# May 31, 2007 6:19 PM

Mike Lockhart said:

Thank you sooooo much Oracle!

Now I can more successfully argue that projects should use SQL Server on the back end (which is much easier for the developer) rather than Oracle ([via TOAD], very scalable, but overkill for most of what we do [intranet web apps]). I love it when vendors do this proprietary crap.

# June 13, 2007 8:42 PM

Guy Burstein's Blog said:

Over the past year I've written almost 300 posts, and recently I took the time to see which posts were

# July 29, 2007 9:34 PM

Craig Main said:

I agree with Mike.

For Oracle to drag their heels in the face of this kind of innovation (linq) they deserve to loose customers.

We will use linq anyway, and use linq over ADO.NET as clunky as that might be until we are able to migrate off of oracle.

# August 3, 2007 2:15 PM

Marcel Meyer said:

It seems like the Java world is still not getting their head around what LINQ really means for the development community at large: creating unified, first class query capability over any data store (memory, xml, data (basically any thing that smells like data), vendor insensitive, expandable) with type checking, design time support while extending the OOP model to include functional programming concepts?

Or do they not want to get it?

Regards,

Marcel

# September 29, 2007 3:58 AM

Kaveh Shahbazian said:

I totally agree with Mike! And now I am enjoying SQL Server luxury (from a developer point of view)! And happily I gave up the honor of being an oracle-struggling-master!

Cheers!

# December 24, 2007 2:11 PM