PC Magazine has published an article discussing 21 technologies that have failed. As PC mag states, they are not bad technologies, they just weren't on the right time and the right place.
Apparently only 2 companies tried to deliver technologies that failed: Microsoft, 2nd place with 10 technologies and lucky winner Apple with 11 (!) technologies.
I will not argue about the editor taste, anybody can think on their own favorite failures that are not included in this prestige list.
What did caught my eyes is that .Net is included, yep, .Net for the last 5 years of my life I've spend coding and debugging with .net, and some of you aswell I might guess. Now forever it is listed has a failure, if you ask PC magazine, I guess.
What do you think?
Ariel